style(node): tighten the comments and probe assertion from the QA pass

Two follow-ups on the preceding fixes, no behaviour change:

- The sweep comment in inbound_node.go had grown to a contiguous six-line
  block, over the two-line maximum. The prefix rationale it carried is
  already stated by nodeSelectedTagSet itself and by 6f40a51d's message.
- The probe cap test asserted only that an error came back, which cannot
  tell a size rejection from a transport failure or a success=false
  envelope. It now pins LastError to the decode rejection.

Both remain red-first: neutralizing maxProbeBodyBytes still fails the probe
test on the new assertion.
This commit is contained in:
Sanaei
2026-09-04 02:48:44 +02:00
parent 5fc4b9f463
commit 2e81865a02
2 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
@@ -12,9 +12,7 @@ import (
"github.com/mhsanaei/3x-ui/v3/internal/database/model"
)
// A node answers the probe over a connection the master does not control in the
// skip/pin TLS modes, so an oversized status body must be rejected rather than
// buffered whole by encoding/json.
// An oversized status body must be rejected, not buffered whole by encoding/json.
func TestProbeRejectsOversizedStatusBody(t *testing.T) {
srv := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, _ *http.Request) {
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
@@ -41,7 +39,12 @@ func TestProbeRejectsOversizedStatusBody(t *testing.T) {
}
svc := &NodeService{}
if _, err := svc.Probe(context.Background(), n); err == nil {
patch, err := svc.Probe(context.Background(), n)
if err == nil {
t.Fatal("Probe accepted a 3 MiB status body, want an error")
}
// Pin the rejection to the capped decode, not a transport or envelope failure.
if !strings.HasPrefix(patch.LastError, "decode response: ") {
t.Fatalf("LastError = %q, want a \"decode response: \" rejection", patch.LastError)
}
}