In a mixed BulkAdjust (both a days delta and a bytes delta), a per-field
planning skip such as "unlimited expiry" or "unlimited traffic" was recorded
in the same map that gated the client_traffics write. The applied field was
already written to the inbound JSON and the clients table, but the enforcement
row was left untouched, so the depletion job cut the client on the old limit
while the panel showed the new one. Gate the traffic-row write on an actual
inbound-processing failure rather than on any planning-phase skip note.
BulkAdjust clamped a client's new traffic limit with max(total+addBytes, 0).
Because 0 is the unlimited sentinel, reducing a client's quota by more than
it had left silently granted that client unlimited traffic. The sibling
expiry branch already refuses an over-reduction; mirror it for quota so the
adjustment is skipped with a clear reason instead of crossing the sentinel.
Renewing a subscription via POST /panel/api/clients/bulkAdjust extended a client's expiry/quota but left it disabled. The enforcement loop disables a depleted client across client_traffics, client_records and the inbound settings JSON (and pushes that to the node), while BulkAdjust only updated expiry/total and never cleared enable. On a node its UpdateUser push was built from the stale ClientRecord (Enable=false), which the next traffic poll merged back onto the master, so the client never recovered.
BulkAdjust now re-enables a client only when it was disabled because it was depleted and the adjustment lifts it back within limits, computed as a set-difference of the production depletedCond predicate and applied through the canonical BulkSetEnable (run after the per-inbound loop, since lockInbound is non-reentrant). Manually-disabled or still-depleted clients stay disabled.
Update now writes the clients.enable column explicitly so re-enabling sticks for inbound-less clients and stops feeding a stale record into node pushes.
MHSanaei