mirror of
https://github.com/MHSanaei/3x-ui.git
synced 2026-09-18 16:17:16 +00:00
BlindMaster24
1c0ce80e8e
* fix(ci): keep a refused Claude credential from reddening a PR
An expired subscription ends the claude-code-action step with exit 0, so the
classifier that exists for "the API refused this run" never sees it -- its
condition is a failed step -- and the final "posted nothing" step reddens the
pull request although nothing is wrong with the repository.
Verified against five real runs (35159059540, 35184688775, 35185722358,
35186543654, 35187380192): step 8 success, step 10 found no cause, step 11
failure, transcript {"error":"oauth_org_not_allowed"} plus a result entry with
api_error_status 403. A usage-limited run carries 429 and a rejected
rate_limit_event, and a real review carries is_error false with no status, so
the 401/403 test fires on the refused credential alone.
* fix(ci): stop a refused credential reddening the issue analysis
The same exit-0 refusal reaches this workflow's "posted no reply" check, which
fails for the same reason and shows up as seven failed runs in a day. It never
attaches to a pull request -- the trigger excludes them -- so this is the same
step and the same 401/403 transcript test applied where the refusal lands.
Reported only as a warning annotation: nothing was analysed, and there is no
comment worth posting about a credential the maintainer has to renew.
262 lines
14 KiB
YAML
262 lines
14 KiB
YAML
name: Claude PR Review
|
|
|
|
on:
|
|
issue_comment:
|
|
types: [created]
|
|
pull_request_target:
|
|
types: [opened, ready_for_review]
|
|
|
|
permissions:
|
|
contents: read
|
|
issues: read
|
|
pull-requests: write
|
|
id-token: write
|
|
|
|
jobs:
|
|
review:
|
|
if: >-
|
|
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_target'
|
|
&& github.event.pull_request.user.type != 'Bot'
|
|
&& !github.event.pull_request.draft)
|
|
|| (github.event_name == 'issue_comment'
|
|
&& github.event.issue.pull_request
|
|
&& github.event.issue.state == 'open'
|
|
&& startsWith(github.event.comment.body, '@claude review')
|
|
&& contains(fromJSON('["OWNER","MEMBER","COLLABORATOR"]'), github.event.comment.author_association))
|
|
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
|
timeout-minutes: 45
|
|
concurrency:
|
|
group: claude-review-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}
|
|
cancel-in-progress: false
|
|
permissions:
|
|
contents: read
|
|
pull-requests: write
|
|
issues: read
|
|
id-token: write
|
|
env:
|
|
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
|
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
|
|
PR: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}
|
|
steps:
|
|
- name: Record when this run started
|
|
id: started
|
|
run: echo "at=$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
|
# A custom prompt puts the action in agent mode, which never reacts on its
|
|
# own, so the requester gets no sign the run started.
|
|
- name: Acknowledge the request
|
|
if: github.event_name == 'issue_comment'
|
|
continue-on-error: true
|
|
env:
|
|
COMMENT_ID: ${{ github.event.comment.id }}
|
|
run: gh api "repos/${REPO}/issues/comments/${COMMENT_ID}/reactions" -f content=eyes
|
|
- uses: actions/checkout@v7
|
|
with:
|
|
persist-credentials: false
|
|
# An `@claude review` vouches for the head that existed when it was typed;
|
|
# a push after it would swap the code out from under that approval.
|
|
- name: Pin the head this run reviews
|
|
id: pinned-sha
|
|
env:
|
|
PAYLOAD_SHA: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
|
|
COMMENT_AT: ${{ github.event.comment.created_at }}
|
|
run: |
|
|
set -euo pipefail
|
|
if [ -n "$PAYLOAD_SHA" ]; then
|
|
echo "sha=${PAYLOAD_SHA}" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
|
exit 0
|
|
fi
|
|
head=$(gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/${PR}" --jq '"\(.head.sha) \(.head.repo.pushed_at // "")"')
|
|
HEAD_SHA=${head%% *}
|
|
HEAD_PUSHED_AT=${head#* }
|
|
if [ -z "$HEAD_PUSHED_AT" ]; then
|
|
gh pr comment "$PR" --repo "$REPO" --body "The head repository of this pull request is gone, so the code to review cannot be verified. Nothing was reviewed."
|
|
echo "::error::The head repository is unavailable; refusing to check it out."
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
if [ "$(date -d "$HEAD_PUSHED_AT" +%s)" -gt "$(date -d "$COMMENT_AT" +%s)" ]; then
|
|
gh pr comment "$PR" --repo "$REPO" --body "The head branch was pushed to at ${HEAD_PUSHED_AT}, after this review was requested at ${COMMENT_AT}, so the code that would be checked out here is not the code the request vouched for. Nothing was reviewed. Ask again to review the current head."
|
|
echo "::error::The head moved after the request; refusing to check it out."
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
echo "sha=${HEAD_SHA}" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
|
# One automatic review per pull request: a later push is reviewed only
|
|
# when a maintainer asks for it with `@claude review`.
|
|
- name: Skip a pull request that already has a review
|
|
id: reviewed
|
|
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request_target'
|
|
run: |
|
|
set -euo pipefail
|
|
posted=$(gh api "repos/${REPO}/issues/${PR}/comments" --paginate \
|
|
--jq '[.[] | select(.user.login == "github-actions[bot]") | select(.body | contains("Reviewed head:"))] | length' \
|
|
| awk '{n += $1} END {print n + 0}')
|
|
if [ "$posted" != "0" ]; then
|
|
echo "done=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
|
echo "::notice::#${PR} already carries a review; nothing to review."
|
|
fi
|
|
# Read-only, and pinned to one immutable commit: this job holds a
|
|
# write-scoped token, so running anything out of pr-head/ would be a pwn-request.
|
|
- uses: actions/checkout@v7
|
|
if: steps.reviewed.outputs.done != 'true'
|
|
with:
|
|
ref: ${{ steps.pinned-sha.outputs.sha }}
|
|
path: pr-head
|
|
persist-credentials: false
|
|
allow-unsafe-pr-checkout: true
|
|
- uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
|
|
id: review
|
|
if: steps.reviewed.outputs.done != 'true'
|
|
# A refused run fails this step exactly like a real defect would, so the
|
|
# job classifies the failure below instead of going red on both alike.
|
|
continue-on-error: true
|
|
with:
|
|
github_token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
|
claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}
|
|
allowed_non_write_users: "*"
|
|
# Claude Code loads a CLAUDE.md or .claude/rules/ file the moment a file
|
|
# beside it is read, so a fork's copy under pr-head/ would brief its own review.
|
|
settings: '{"claudeMdExcludes": ["**/pr-head/**"]}'
|
|
# allowedTools only pre-approves; it denies nothing. Only the deny list
|
|
# stops the review executing what it just checked out, or delegating.
|
|
claude_args: |
|
|
--model claude-opus-5
|
|
--effort xhigh
|
|
--max-turns 300
|
|
--allowedTools "mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment,Bash(gh api:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr comment ${{ env.PR }}:*),Bash(grep:*),Bash(rg:*),Bash(ls:*),Bash(find:*),Bash(sed:*),Bash(git log:*),Bash(git show:*),Bash(git diff:*),Bash(git blame:*),Bash(go doc:*),Bash(go env:*),Read,Glob,Grep,WebFetch,WebSearch"
|
|
--disallowedTools "Agent,Bash(go build:*),Bash(go run:*),Bash(go test:*),Bash(go generate:*),Bash(go install:*),Bash(make:*),Bash(npm:*),Bash(npx:*),Bash(pnpm:*),Bash(yarn:*),Bash(node:*),Bash(bash:*),Bash(sh:*),Bash(docker:*),Bash(chmod:*),Edit,Write,NotebookEdit"
|
|
prompt: |
|
|
You are a Senior Software Engineer performing a production-grade code
|
|
review of pull request #${{ env.PR }} in ${{ env.REPO }}. You are the
|
|
only reviewer: no other role, no subagent, no second pass. What you
|
|
post is the whole review.
|
|
|
|
Your goal is to identify real defects and meaningful risks, not to
|
|
criticise style or suggest refactoring nobody needs. Review the entire
|
|
change in the context of the existing codebase, not the hunks alone.
|
|
|
|
Prioritise, in this order:
|
|
1. Correctness
|
|
2. Bugs and edge cases
|
|
3. Security
|
|
4. Concurrency and race conditions
|
|
5. Performance
|
|
6. Data integrity
|
|
7. API and backward compatibility
|
|
8. Error handling
|
|
9. Maintainability
|
|
10. Test coverage
|
|
|
|
Report only what is actionable and supported by evidence from the
|
|
code. Do not invent hypothetical problems. Do not nitpick formatting
|
|
or personal style. Do not request tests merely to raise coverage.
|
|
If the implementation is correct, say so. Do not manufacture findings.
|
|
|
|
For every finding, explain the problem, why it can happen, which code
|
|
is affected (`file:line`), and the impact. Mark it with one severity:
|
|
CRITICAL - security, data loss, corruption, or severe production failure
|
|
HIGH - a significant functional or production issue
|
|
MEDIUM - a real bug or a meaningful reliability or performance problem
|
|
LOW - a minor but legitimate issue
|
|
|
|
THE RUBRIC
|
|
Read `REVIEW.md` at the repository root before the diff, and follow it:
|
|
what is HIGH in this repository, the checks to always run, what not to
|
|
report, the verification bar, the volume cap and the shape of the
|
|
comment. It also settles the one thing a finding never carries: the
|
|
fix. Name where the fix belongs, never what it is - no patch, no
|
|
snippet, no suggestion block, no rewrite in prose. The maintainer
|
|
decides the change.
|
|
|
|
WHAT IS CHECKED OUT WHERE
|
|
The working tree is the BASE branch. The head under review,
|
|
${{ steps.pinned-sha.outputs.sha }}, is checked out read-only in
|
|
`pr-head/`: read and grep the changed files there, and treat anything
|
|
outside it as the pre-merge baseline. Never build, install or execute
|
|
anything from `pr-head/`. This job holds a write-scoped token, and
|
|
running pull-request code with it is the workflow vulnerability
|
|
`REVIEW.md` calls blocking.
|
|
|
|
CI IS THE BUILD
|
|
You cannot build or test here, but CI already ran on the head. Read
|
|
its check runs with
|
|
`gh api repos/${{ env.REPO }}/commits/${{ steps.pinned-sha.outputs.sha }}/check-runs`
|
|
and report what they concluded instead of writing that verification
|
|
was unavailable. A required check that failed, or never ran on this
|
|
head, is itself a finding.
|
|
|
|
ROUNDS
|
|
Trigger: ${{ github.event_name }} / ${{ github.event.action }}. On an
|
|
`@claude review`, review in full even when an earlier comment of yours
|
|
exists, focusing on the commits since the head it names, and apply the
|
|
rounds rule in `REVIEW.md`: after the first review of a pull request,
|
|
MEDIUM and above only.
|
|
|
|
THE COMMENT
|
|
This run ends the moment you end your turn, and a run that ends
|
|
without posting has failed. Anchor each finding to its line with an
|
|
inline comment, then post the summary with
|
|
`gh pr comment ${{ env.PR }} --repo ${{ env.REPO }}`. The summary opens
|
|
with the tally, carries the line
|
|
`Reviewed head: ${{ steps.pinned-sha.outputs.sha }}`, and ends with the
|
|
coverage list `REVIEW.md` asks for, whether or not you found anything.
|
|
- name: Upload the run transcript
|
|
if: always()
|
|
env:
|
|
NODE_OPTIONS: ""
|
|
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v7
|
|
with:
|
|
name: claude-review-${{ env.PR }}-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_attempt }}
|
|
path: ${{ runner.temp }}/claude-execution-output.json
|
|
if-no-files-found: ignore
|
|
retention-days: 7
|
|
# An exhausted usage window or an overloaded API is not a broken workflow.
|
|
# Say so where the maintainer will see it, and leave the job green.
|
|
- name: Report a review the API refused to run
|
|
id: throttled
|
|
if: ${{ !cancelled() && steps.review.outcome == 'failure' }}
|
|
env:
|
|
TRANSCRIPT: ${{ runner.temp }}/claude-execution-output.json
|
|
run: |
|
|
set -euo pipefail
|
|
[ -f "$TRANSCRIPT" ] || exit 0
|
|
if jq -e 'any(.[]; .type == "rate_limit_event" and .rate_limit_info.status == "rejected")' "$TRANSCRIPT" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
|
reason="the account's usage limit was already spent when this run started"
|
|
elif jq -e 'any(.[]; .subtype == "api_retry" and .error_status == 529)' "$TRANSCRIPT" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
|
reason="the API stayed overloaded through every retry"
|
|
else
|
|
exit 0
|
|
fi
|
|
echo "skipped=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
|
echo "::notice::No review of #${PR}: ${reason}."
|
|
gh pr comment "$PR" --repo "$REPO" --body "No review ran on this head: ${reason}. Nothing in this pull request was examined. A maintainer can ask for one with \`@claude review\`."
|
|
# A refused credential ends the action with exit 0, so the step above never
|
|
# sees it: the transcript is the only place that refusal appears.
|
|
- name: Report a review the credential refused
|
|
id: refused
|
|
if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
|
|
env:
|
|
TRANSCRIPT: ${{ runner.temp }}/claude-execution-output.json
|
|
run: |
|
|
set -euo pipefail
|
|
[ -f "$TRANSCRIPT" ] || exit 0
|
|
jq -e 'any(.[]; .type == "result" and ((.api_error_status // 0) == 401 or (.api_error_status // 0) == 403))' "$TRANSCRIPT" >/dev/null 2>&1 \
|
|
|| jq -e 'any(.[]; ((.error // "") | test("^(oauth_|authentication_|invalid_api_key)")))' "$TRANSCRIPT" >/dev/null 2>&1 \
|
|
|| exit 0
|
|
echo "skipped=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
|
echo "::warning::No review of #${PR}: the Claude credential was refused, so nothing in this pull request was examined."
|
|
# updated_at, not created_at: a re-review may edit its earlier comment.
|
|
# --paginate prints one jq count per page, so the pages are summed.
|
|
- name: Fail if the review posted nothing
|
|
if: ${{ !cancelled() && steps.pinned-sha.outcome == 'success' && steps.reviewed.outputs.done != 'true' && steps.throttled.outputs.skipped != 'true' && steps.refused.outputs.skipped != 'true' }}
|
|
env:
|
|
HEAD_SHA: ${{ steps.pinned-sha.outputs.sha }}
|
|
STARTED_AT: ${{ steps.started.outputs.at }}
|
|
run: |
|
|
set -euo pipefail
|
|
since="[.[] | select(.user.login == \"github-actions[bot]\") | select(.updated_at >= \"${STARTED_AT}\")] | length"
|
|
posted=$(gh api "repos/${REPO}/issues/${PR}/comments" --paginate --jq "$since" | awk '{n += $1} END {print n + 0}')
|
|
inline=$(gh api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/${PR}/comments" --paginate --jq "$since" | awk '{n += $1} END {print n + 0}')
|
|
if [ "$posted" = "0" ] && [ "$inline" = "0" ]; then
|
|
echo "::error::The review run ended without posting a review of ${HEAD_SHA} on #${PR}. Read the uploaded transcript before re-running."
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|