mirror of
https://github.com/MHSanaei/3x-ui.git
synced 2026-09-09 19:57:14 +00:00
f5543047b7
Two gaps left an AmneziaWG interface stuck outside the manager's control after a crash (kill -9/OOM/panic skips StopAll): - ensureRestart's teardown was gated on the in-memory `exists` map, which is always empty on a fresh process, so a survived interface never got interfaceDown before interfaceUp tried `ip link add` against a name the kernel already had — failing forever and never populating m.ifaces, so traffic accounting silently stopped and the inbound could never be removed. Gate on isInterfaceUp instead, which checks real kernel state rather than this process's own bookkeeping. - An inbound deleted from the database entirely while the panel was down has no entry in `desired` ever again, so it never reaches the per-id cleanup loop in Reconcile (which only walks m.ifaces). Add a one-time sweepOrphansLocked scan of configDir, mirroring mtproto.Manager.sweepOrphansLocked, that tears down and removes any leftover interface/config not in the current desired set. Found by the automated review on MHSanaei/3x-ui#6105 (Finding 1). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
420 lines
15 KiB
Go
420 lines
15 KiB
Go
package amneziawg
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"slices"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/mhsanaei/3x-ui/v3/internal/database/model"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func mkInboundSettings(t *testing.T, server *ServerSettings, clients []model.Client) string {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
bs, err := json.Marshal(InboundSettings{Server: server, Clients: clients})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("marshal settings: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
return string(bs)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func validServer() *ServerSettings {
|
|
return &ServerSettings{
|
|
PrivateKey: "serverPriv",
|
|
PublicKey: "serverPub",
|
|
SubnetIP: "10.8.1.0",
|
|
SubnetCIDR: 24,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInstanceFromInboundParsesEnabledPeers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
settings := mkInboundSettings(t, validServer(), []model.Client{
|
|
{Email: "a@x", Enable: true, PublicKey: "pubA", PreSharedKey: "pskA", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.2/32"}},
|
|
{Email: "b@x", Enable: false, PublicKey: "pubB", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.3/32"}},
|
|
{Email: "c@x", Enable: true, PublicKey: "", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.4/32"}}, // no key: skipped
|
|
{Email: "d@x", Enable: true, PublicKey: "pubD", AllowedIPs: nil}, // no address: skipped
|
|
})
|
|
ib := &model.Inbound{Id: 7, Tag: "awg-tag", Protocol: model.AmneziaWG, Port: 51820, Settings: settings}
|
|
|
|
inst, ok := InstanceFromInbound(ib)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("expected a usable instance")
|
|
}
|
|
if inst.Id != 7 || inst.Tag != "awg-tag" || inst.ListenPort != 51820 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("instance identity not carried over: %+v", inst)
|
|
}
|
|
if inst.InterfaceName != "awg7" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("InterfaceName = %q, want awg7", inst.InterfaceName)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(inst.Address) != 1 || inst.Address[0] != "10.8.1.1/24" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Address = %v, want [10.8.1.1/24]", inst.Address)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(inst.Peers) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Peers = %+v, want exactly 1 (only a@x qualifies)", inst.Peers)
|
|
}
|
|
p := inst.Peers[0]
|
|
if p.Email != "a@x" || p.PublicKey != "pubA" || p.PresharedKey != "pskA" || len(p.AllowedIPs) != 1 || p.AllowedIPs[0] != "10.8.1.2/32" {
|
|
t.Fatalf("peer mismatch: %+v", p)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInstanceFromInboundRejectsWrongProtocol(t *testing.T) {
|
|
settings := mkInboundSettings(t, validServer(), []model.Client{
|
|
{Email: "a@x", Enable: true, PublicKey: "pubA", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.2/32"}},
|
|
})
|
|
ib := &model.Inbound{Id: 1, Protocol: model.VLESS, Settings: settings}
|
|
if _, ok := InstanceFromInbound(ib); ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("non-AmneziaWG inbound must be rejected")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInstanceFromInboundRejectsNil(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if _, ok := InstanceFromInbound(nil); ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("nil inbound must be rejected")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInstanceFromInboundRejectsMissingServer(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ib := &model.Inbound{Id: 1, Protocol: model.AmneziaWG, Settings: `{"clients":[]}`}
|
|
if _, ok := InstanceFromInbound(ib); ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("settings with no server block must be rejected")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInstanceFromInboundRejectsUnparseableSettings(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ib := &model.Inbound{Id: 1, Protocol: model.AmneziaWG, Settings: `not json`}
|
|
if _, ok := InstanceFromInbound(ib); ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("unparseable settings must be rejected")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInstanceFromInboundEmptyWhenNoEnabledPeers(t *testing.T) {
|
|
settings := mkInboundSettings(t, validServer(), []model.Client{
|
|
{Email: "a@x", Enable: false, PublicKey: "pubA", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.2/32"}},
|
|
})
|
|
ib := &model.Inbound{Id: 1, Protocol: model.AmneziaWG, Settings: settings}
|
|
if _, ok := InstanceFromInbound(ib); ok {
|
|
t.Fatal("an inbound with zero enabled peers must be skipped, like mtproto.InstanceFromInbound")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestServerAddress(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
subnet string
|
|
cidr int
|
|
want string
|
|
}{
|
|
{"10.8.1.0", 24, "10.8.1.1/24"},
|
|
{"10.8.1.0", 0, "10.8.1.1/24"}, // cidr <= 0 defaults to /24
|
|
{"192.168.5.10", 32, "192.168.5.10/32"},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
if got := serverAddress(c.subnet, c.cidr); got != c.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("serverAddress(%q, %d) = %q, want %q", c.subnet, c.cidr, got, c.want)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// fixedObfuscation is a deterministic Obfuscation20 for tests that compare
|
|
// two instances for equality — GenerateObfuscation20 is randomized per call
|
|
// by design (see its doc comment) and must never be used where the test
|
|
// expects two "identical" instances to actually match.
|
|
func fixedObfuscation() Obfuscation20 {
|
|
return Obfuscation20{Jc: 4, Jmin: 40, Jmax: 100, S1: 30, S2: 90, S3: 20, S4: 10, H1: "10-2000", H2: "3000-5000", H3: "6000-8000", H4: "9000-11000", I1: "<r 64>"}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func baseInstance() Instance {
|
|
return Instance{
|
|
Id: 1,
|
|
Tag: "awg-1",
|
|
InterfaceName: "awg1",
|
|
ListenPort: 51820,
|
|
PrivateKey: "priv",
|
|
PublicKey: "pub",
|
|
Address: []string{"10.8.1.1/24"},
|
|
Obfuscation: fixedObfuscation(),
|
|
Peers: []Peer{
|
|
{Email: "a@x", PublicKey: "pubA", PresharedKey: "pskA", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.2/32"}},
|
|
{Email: "b@x", PublicKey: "pubB", AllowedIPs: []string{"10.8.1.3/32"}},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestStructuralFingerprintStableAndSensitive(t *testing.T) {
|
|
a := baseInstance()
|
|
b := baseInstance()
|
|
if a.structuralFingerprint() != b.structuralFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("identical instances must produce the same structural fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
b.ListenPort = 51821
|
|
if a.structuralFingerprint() == b.structuralFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("a listen port change must change the structural fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
c := baseInstance()
|
|
c.Peers[0].AllowedIPs = []string{"10.8.1.99/32"}
|
|
if a.structuralFingerprint() != c.structuralFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("a peer-only change must NOT change the structural fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestPeersFingerprintOrderIndependentButContentSensitive(t *testing.T) {
|
|
a := baseInstance()
|
|
reordered := baseInstance()
|
|
reordered.Peers[0], reordered.Peers[1] = reordered.Peers[1], reordered.Peers[0]
|
|
if a.peersFingerprint() != reordered.peersFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("reordering peers must not change the peers fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
changed := baseInstance()
|
|
changed.Peers[0].AllowedIPs = []string{"10.8.1.250/32"}
|
|
if a.peersFingerprint() == changed.peersFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("changing a peer's AllowedIPs must change the peers fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fewer := baseInstance()
|
|
fewer.Peers = fewer.Peers[:1]
|
|
if a.peersFingerprint() == fewer.peersFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("removing a peer must change the peers fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEnsureActionFor(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
up bool
|
|
curStruct, curHostRules, curPeers string
|
|
newStruct, newHostRules, newPeers string
|
|
want ensureAction
|
|
}{
|
|
{"down forces restart even if identical", false, "s", "f", "p", "s", "f", "p", ensureRestart},
|
|
{"structural change forces restart", true, "s1", "f", "p", "s2", "f", "p", ensureRestart},
|
|
{"port-forward change forces restart", true, "s", "f1", "p", "s", "f2", "p", ensureRestart},
|
|
{"peer-ip change (its TPROXY rule) forces restart", true, "s", "ip:old", "p", "s", "ip:new", "p", ensureRestart},
|
|
{"peers-only change reloads", true, "s", "f", "p1", "s", "f", "p2", ensureReload},
|
|
{"identical up interface is a noop", true, "s", "f", "p", "s", "f", "p", ensureNoop},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(c.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
got := ensureActionFor(c.up, c.curStruct, c.curHostRules, c.curPeers, c.newStruct, c.newHostRules, c.newPeers)
|
|
if got != c.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("ensureActionFor() = %v, want %v", got, c.want)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestHostRulesFingerprintCoversForwardedPortsAndPeerIP(t *testing.T) {
|
|
a := baseInstance()
|
|
b := baseInstance()
|
|
if a.hostRulesFingerprint() != b.hostRulesFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("identical instances must produce the same host-rules fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
if a.hostRulesFingerprint() == "" {
|
|
t.Fatal("every peer always gets a TPROXY rule now, so the fingerprint must never be empty when peers exist")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
forwarded := baseInstance()
|
|
forwarded.Peers[0].ForwardedPorts = "80,443"
|
|
if a.hostRulesFingerprint() == forwarded.hostRulesFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("adding ForwardedPorts must change the host-rules fingerprint")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
reIPed := baseInstance()
|
|
reIPed.Peers[0].AllowedIPs = []string{"10.8.1.250/32"}
|
|
if a.hostRulesFingerprint() == reIPed.hostRulesFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("changing a peer's IP must change the host-rules fingerprint -- its TPROXY rule is keyed on that IP")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fewer := baseInstance()
|
|
fewer.Peers = fewer.Peers[:1]
|
|
if a.hostRulesFingerprint() == fewer.hostRulesFingerprint() {
|
|
t.Fatal("removing a peer must change the host-rules fingerprint -- one fewer TPROXY rule is needed")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestRouteEgressComment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := routeEgressComment(""); got != "awg-route" {
|
|
t.Errorf("empty email must fall back to awg-route, got %q", got)
|
|
}
|
|
a := routeEgressComment("a@x")
|
|
b := routeEgressComment("b@x")
|
|
if a == b {
|
|
t.Fatal("different emails must produce different comment tags")
|
|
}
|
|
if a != routeEgressComment("a@x") {
|
|
t.Fatal("the same email must always produce the same comment tag")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestRouteEgressLines(t *testing.T) {
|
|
up := routeEgressLines("-A", "awg1", "10.8.1.2/32", "a@x", 63101)
|
|
if len(up) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected one TPROXY line per protocol (tcp+udp), got %d: %v", len(up), up)
|
|
}
|
|
for _, proto := range []string{"tcp", "udp"} {
|
|
found := false
|
|
for _, l := range up {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(l, "-p "+proto) {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
found = true
|
|
if !strings.Contains(l, "-i awg1") || !strings.Contains(l, "-s 10.8.1.2") ||
|
|
!strings.Contains(l, "--on-port 63101") ||
|
|
!strings.Contains(l, "--on-ip 127.0.0.1") ||
|
|
!strings.Contains(l, fmt.Sprintf("--tproxy-mark %#x/%#x", EgressFwmark, EgressFwmark)) ||
|
|
!strings.Contains(l, "-A PREROUTING") {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s line missing expected fields: %s", proto, l)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !found {
|
|
t.Errorf("missing a %s TPROXY line in %v", proto, up)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if strings.Contains(up[0], "10.8.1.2/32") {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected the /32 mask stripped from the source match, got %s", up[0])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
down := routeEgressLines("-D", "awg1", "10.8.1.2/32", "a@x", 63101)
|
|
if len(down) != 2 || !strings.Contains(down[0], "-D PREROUTING") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected symmetric -D lines, got %v", down)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if got := routeEgressLines("-A", "awg1", "", "a@x", 63101); got != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("empty clientIP must yield no lines, got %v", got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestEgressPortForInbound(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := EgressPortForInbound(1); got != EgressBasePort+1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("EgressPortForInbound(1) = %d, want %d", got, EgressBasePort+1)
|
|
}
|
|
if EgressPortForInbound(1) == EgressPortForInbound(2) {
|
|
t.Fatal("different inbound ids must derive different ports")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestDefaultPostUpDownEmitsTproxyForEveryPeer(t *testing.T) {
|
|
inst := baseInstance() // two peers, a@x and b@x, no opt-in flag exists anymore
|
|
up, down := defaultPostUpDown(inst, "eth0")
|
|
|
|
wantPort := fmt.Sprintf("--on-port %d", EgressPortForInbound(inst.Id))
|
|
if !strings.Contains(up, "TPROXY") || !strings.Contains(up, wantPort) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected TPROXY rules targeting this instance's own bridge port in PostUp, got:\n%s", up)
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(down, "TPROXY") {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected matching TPROXY removals in PostDown, got:\n%s", down)
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(up, fmt.Sprintf("ip rule add fwmark %#x", EgressFwmark)) {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected the shared policy route to be added once in PostUp, got:\n%s", up)
|
|
}
|
|
if strings.Contains(down, "ip rule") || strings.Contains(down, "ip route") {
|
|
t.Error("the shared policy route must never be removed in PostDown -- other instances may still need it")
|
|
}
|
|
// Both peers always get TPROXY'd now, no opt-in: 2 peers * 2 protocols.
|
|
if got := strings.Count(up, "TPROXY"); got != 4 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected exactly 4 TPROXY lines (tcp+udp for each of the 2 peers), got %d in:\n%s", got, up)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
none := Instance{Id: 2, InterfaceName: "awg2"} // no peers at all
|
|
upNone, _ := defaultPostUpDown(none, "eth0")
|
|
if strings.Contains(upNone, "TPROXY") || strings.Contains(upNone, "ip rule add fwmark") {
|
|
t.Errorf("an instance with no peers must not emit any TPROXY/policy-route lines, got:\n%s", upNone)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestGenerateServerConfigContainsExpectedLines(t *testing.T) {
|
|
inst := baseInstance()
|
|
inst.ExternalInterface = "eth0"
|
|
cfg := generateServerConfig(inst)
|
|
|
|
want := []string{
|
|
"[Interface]",
|
|
"PrivateKey = priv",
|
|
"Address = 10.8.1.1/24",
|
|
"ListenPort = 51820",
|
|
"[Peer]",
|
|
"PublicKey = pubA",
|
|
"PresharedKey = pskA",
|
|
"AllowedIPs = 10.8.1.2/32",
|
|
"PublicKey = pubB",
|
|
"AllowedIPs = 10.8.1.3/32",
|
|
"MASQUERADE",
|
|
}
|
|
for _, w := range want {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(cfg, w) {
|
|
t.Errorf("generated config missing %q\n---\n%s", w, cfg)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// The second peer has no PresharedKey — its block must not emit the field at all.
|
|
if strings.Count(cfg, "PresharedKey") != 1 {
|
|
t.Errorf("expected exactly one PresharedKey line (peer b@x has none), got config:\n%s", cfg)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestWriteObfuscationDefaultsBlankH(t *testing.T) {
|
|
var b strings.Builder
|
|
writeObfuscation(&b, Obfuscation20{})
|
|
out := b.String()
|
|
for i, want := range []string{"H1 = 1", "H2 = 2", "H3 = 3", "H4 = 4"} {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(out, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("blank H%d must fall back to default %q, got:\n%s", i+1, want, out)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// S3/S4/I1 are zero-valued here and must be omitted entirely.
|
|
if strings.Contains(out, "S3") || strings.Contains(out, "S4") || strings.Contains(out, "I1") {
|
|
t.Errorf("zero-valued S3/S4/I1 must be omitted, got:\n%s", out)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInterfaceNameForID(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if got := interfaceNameForID(42); got != "awg42" {
|
|
t.Errorf("interfaceNameForID(42) = %q, want awg42", got)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInboundIDForInterfaceName(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
wantID int
|
|
wantOK bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{"awg42", 42, true},
|
|
{"awg0", 0, true},
|
|
{"awg", 0, false}, // no digits after the prefix
|
|
{"wg0", 0, false}, // wrong prefix entirely (plain WireGuard)
|
|
{"awgabc", 0, false}, // non-numeric suffix
|
|
{"awg-1", 0, false}, // Atoi rejects the leading '-' as part of TrimPrefix's leftover, but guard anyway
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cases {
|
|
id, ok := inboundIDForInterfaceName(c.name)
|
|
if ok != c.wantOK || (ok && id != c.wantID) {
|
|
t.Errorf("inboundIDForInterfaceName(%q) = (%d, %v), want (%d, %v)", c.name, id, ok, c.wantID, c.wantOK)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestOrphanedInterfaces(t *testing.T) {
|
|
confFiles := []string{
|
|
"awg1.conf", // in want -> not orphaned
|
|
"awg2.conf", // not in want -> orphaned
|
|
"awg3.conf", // not in want -> orphaned
|
|
"notes.txt", // wrong suffix -> ignored
|
|
"awgxyz.conf", // unparseable id -> ignored
|
|
}
|
|
want := map[int]struct{}{1: {}}
|
|
|
|
got := orphanedInterfaces(confFiles, want)
|
|
slices.Sort(got)
|
|
if wantOut := []string{"awg2", "awg3"}; !slices.Equal(got, wantOut) {
|
|
t.Errorf("orphanedInterfaces() = %v, want %v", got, wantOut)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestOrphanedInterfacesEmptyWantOrphansEverything(t *testing.T) {
|
|
got := orphanedInterfaces([]string{"awg5.conf"}, map[int]struct{}{})
|
|
if want := []string{"awg5"}; !slices.Equal(got, want) {
|
|
t.Errorf("orphanedInterfaces() = %v, want %v", got, want)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|