This commit is contained in:
krahets
2024-05-01 07:30:10 +08:00
parent 583d338530
commit a08cd961b3
64 changed files with 227 additions and 227 deletions
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ Let's understand this concept of "time growth trend" with an example. Assume the
}
```
The following figure shows the time complexities of these three algorithms.
Figure 2-7 shows the time complexities of these three algorithms.
- Algorithm `A` has just one print operation, and its run time does not grow with $n$. Its time complexity is considered "constant order."
- Algorithm `B` involves a print operation looping $n$ times, and its run time grows linearly with $n$. Its time complexity is "linear order."
@@ -1794,7 +1794,7 @@ Quadratic order means the number of operations grows quadratically with the inpu
<div style="height: 477px; width: 100%;"><iframe class="pythontutor-iframe" src="https://pythontutor.com/iframe-embed.html#code=def%20quadratic%28n%29%20-%3E%20int%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22%E5%B9%B3%E6%96%B9%E9%98%B6%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%200%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20%E5%BE%AA%E7%8E%AF%E6%AC%A1%E6%95%B0%E4%B8%8E%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%8F%20n%20%E6%88%90%E5%B9%B3%E6%96%B9%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB%0A%20%20%20%20for%20i%20in%20range%28n%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20for%20j%20in%20range%28n%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20count%20%2B%3D%201%0A%20%20%20%20return%20count%0A%0A%22%22%22Driver%20Code%22%22%22%0Aif%20__name__%20%3D%3D%20%22__main__%22%3A%0A%20%20%20%20n%20%3D%208%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E8%BE%93%E5%85%A5%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%8F%20n%20%3D%22,%20n%29%0A%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%20quadratic%28n%29%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E5%B9%B3%E6%96%B9%E9%98%B6%E7%9A%84%E6%93%8D%E4%BD%9C%E6%95%B0%E9%87%8F%20%3D%22,%20count%29&codeDivHeight=472&codeDivWidth=350&cumulative=false&curInstr=3&heapPrimitives=nevernest&origin=opt-frontend.js&py=311&rawInputLstJSON=%5B%5D&textReferences=false"> </iframe></div>
<div style="margin-top: 5px;"><a href="https://pythontutor.com/iframe-embed.html#code=def%20quadratic%28n%29%20-%3E%20int%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22%E5%B9%B3%E6%96%B9%E9%98%B6%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%200%0A%20%20%20%20%23%20%E5%BE%AA%E7%8E%AF%E6%AC%A1%E6%95%B0%E4%B8%8E%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%8F%20n%20%E6%88%90%E5%B9%B3%E6%96%B9%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB%0A%20%20%20%20for%20i%20in%20range%28n%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20for%20j%20in%20range%28n%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20count%20%2B%3D%201%0A%20%20%20%20return%20count%0A%0A%22%22%22Driver%20Code%22%22%22%0Aif%20__name__%20%3D%3D%20%22__main__%22%3A%0A%20%20%20%20n%20%3D%208%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E8%BE%93%E5%85%A5%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%8F%20n%20%3D%22,%20n%29%0A%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%20quadratic%28n%29%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E5%B9%B3%E6%96%B9%E9%98%B6%E7%9A%84%E6%93%8D%E4%BD%9C%E6%95%B0%E9%87%8F%20%3D%22,%20count%29&codeDivHeight=800&codeDivWidth=600&cumulative=false&curInstr=3&heapPrimitives=nevernest&origin=opt-frontend.js&py=311&rawInputLstJSON=%5B%5D&textReferences=false" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Full Screen ></a></div>
The following image compares constant order, linear order, and quadratic order time complexities.
Figure 2-10 compares constant order, linear order, and quadratic order time complexities.
![Constant, linear, and quadratic order time complexities](time_complexity.assets/time_complexity_constant_linear_quadratic.png){ class="animation-figure" }
@@ -2132,7 +2132,7 @@ For instance, in bubble sort, the outer loop runs $n - 1$ times, and the inner l
Biological "cell division" is a classic example of exponential order growth: starting with one cell, it becomes two after one division, four after two divisions, and so on, resulting in $2^n$ cells after $n$ divisions.
The following image and code simulate the cell division process, with a time complexity of $O(2^n)$:
Figure 2-11 and code simulate the cell division process, with a time complexity of $O(2^n)$:
=== "Python"
@@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ Exponential order growth is extremely rapid and is commonly seen in exhaustive s
In contrast to exponential order, logarithmic order reflects situations where "the size is halved each round." Given an input data size $n$, since the size is halved each round, the number of iterations is $\log_2 n$, the inverse function of $2^n$.
The following image and code simulate the "halving each round" process, with a time complexity of $O(\log_2 n)$, commonly abbreviated as $O(\log n)$:
Figure 2-12 and code simulate the "halving each round" process, with a time complexity of $O(\log_2 n)$, commonly abbreviated as $O(\log n)$:
=== "Python"
@@ -3161,7 +3161,7 @@ Linear-logarithmic order often appears in nested loops, with the complexities of
<div style="height: 477px; width: 100%;"><iframe class="pythontutor-iframe" src="https://pythontutor.com/iframe-embed.html#code=def%20linear_log_recur%28n%3A%20int%29%20-%3E%20int%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22%E7%BA%BF%E6%80%A7%E5%AF%B9%E6%95%B0%E9%98%B6%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20if%20n%20%3C%3D%201%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20return%201%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%20linear_log_recur%28n%20//%202%29%20%2B%20linear_log_recur%28n%20//%202%29%0A%20%20%20%20for%20_%20in%20range%28n%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20count%20%2B%3D%201%0A%20%20%20%20return%20count%0A%0A%22%22%22Driver%20Code%22%22%22%0Aif%20__name__%20%3D%3D%20%22__main__%22%3A%0A%20%20%20%20n%20%3D%208%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E8%BE%93%E5%85%A5%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%8F%20n%20%3D%22,%20n%29%0A%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%20linear_log_recur%28n%29%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E7%BA%BF%E6%80%A7%E5%AF%B9%E6%95%B0%E9%98%B6%EF%BC%88%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E5%AE%9E%E7%8E%B0%EF%BC%89%E7%9A%84%E6%93%8D%E4%BD%9C%E6%95%B0%E9%87%8F%20%3D%22,%20count%29&codeDivHeight=472&codeDivWidth=350&cumulative=false&curInstr=4&heapPrimitives=nevernest&origin=opt-frontend.js&py=311&rawInputLstJSON=%5B%5D&textReferences=false"> </iframe></div>
<div style="margin-top: 5px;"><a href="https://pythontutor.com/iframe-embed.html#code=def%20linear_log_recur%28n%3A%20int%29%20-%3E%20int%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%22%22%22%E7%BA%BF%E6%80%A7%E5%AF%B9%E6%95%B0%E9%98%B6%22%22%22%0A%20%20%20%20if%20n%20%3C%3D%201%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20return%201%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%20linear_log_recur%28n%20//%202%29%20%2B%20linear_log_recur%28n%20//%202%29%0A%20%20%20%20for%20_%20in%20range%28n%29%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20count%20%2B%3D%201%0A%20%20%20%20return%20count%0A%0A%22%22%22Driver%20Code%22%22%22%0Aif%20__name__%20%3D%3D%20%22__main__%22%3A%0A%20%20%20%20n%20%3D%208%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E8%BE%93%E5%85%A5%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE%E5%A4%A7%E5%B0%8F%20n%20%3D%22,%20n%29%0A%0A%20%20%20%20count%20%3D%20linear_log_recur%28n%29%0A%20%20%20%20print%28%22%E7%BA%BF%E6%80%A7%E5%AF%B9%E6%95%B0%E9%98%B6%EF%BC%88%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E5%AE%9E%E7%8E%B0%EF%BC%89%E7%9A%84%E6%93%8D%E4%BD%9C%E6%95%B0%E9%87%8F%20%3D%22,%20count%29&codeDivHeight=800&codeDivWidth=600&cumulative=false&curInstr=4&heapPrimitives=nevernest&origin=opt-frontend.js&py=311&rawInputLstJSON=%5B%5D&textReferences=false" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Full Screen ></a></div>
The image below demonstrates how linear-logarithmic order is generated. Each level of a binary tree has $n$ operations, and the tree has $\log_2 n + 1$ levels, resulting in a time complexity of $O(n \log n)$.
Figure 2-13 demonstrates how linear-logarithmic order is generated. Each level of a binary tree has $n$ operations, and the tree has $\log_2 n + 1$ levels, resulting in a time complexity of $O(n \log n)$.
![Linear-logarithmic order time complexity](time_complexity.assets/time_complexity_logarithmic_linear.png){ class="animation-figure" }
@@ -3177,7 +3177,7 @@ $$
n! = n \times (n - 1) \times (n - 2) \times \dots \times 2 \times 1
$$
Factorials are typically implemented using recursion. As shown in the image and code below, the first level splits into $n$ branches, the second level into $n - 1$ branches, and so on, stopping after the $n$th level:
Factorials are typically implemented using recursion. As shown in the code and Figure 2-14, the first level splits into $n$ branches, the second level into $n - 1$ branches, and so on, stopping after the $n$th level:
=== "Python"