* Review the English version using Claude-4.5. * Update mkdocs.yml * Align the section titles. * Bug fixes
2.2 KiB
Hash optimization strategy
In algorithm problems, we often reduce the time complexity of algorithms by replacing linear search with hash-based search. Let's use an algorithm problem to deepen our understanding.
!!! question
Given an integer array `nums` and a target element `target`, search for two elements in the array whose "sum" equals `target`, and return their array indices. Any solution will do.
Linear search: trading time for space
Consider directly traversing all possible combinations. As shown in the figure below, we open a two-layer loop and judge in each round whether the sum of two integers equals target. If so, return their indices.
The code is shown below:
[file]{two_sum}-[class]{}-[func]{two_sum_brute_force}
This method has a time complexity of O(n^2) and a space complexity of O(1), which is very time-consuming with large data volumes.
Hash-based search: trading space for time
Consider using a hash table where key-value pairs are array elements and element indices respectively. Loop through the array, performing the steps shown in the figure below in each round:
- Check if the number
target - nums[i]is in the hash table. If so, directly return the indices of these two elements. - Add the key-value pair
nums[i]and indexito the hash table.
The implementation code is shown below, requiring only a single loop:
[file]{two_sum}-[class]{}-[func]{two_sum_hash_table}
This method reduces the time complexity from O(n^2) to O(n) through hash-based search, greatly improving runtime efficiency.
Since an additional hash table needs to be maintained, the space complexity is O(n). Nevertheless, this method achieves a more balanced overall time-space efficiency, making it the optimal solution for this problem.



