mirror of
https://github.com/krahets/hello-algo.git
synced 2026-08-28 19:07:14 +00:00
761 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
761 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
comments: true
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 2.6 Exercises
|
|
|
|
## 2.6.1 Concept Review
|
|
|
|
### 1. Time and Space Complexity of Iteration and Recursion
|
|
|
|
The two functions below both calculate $1 + 2 + \dots + n$ (assume $n \ge 1$). Set `n` to 4,
|
|
answer the questions by following the program's actual execution order, and then compare the efficiency of the two approaches.
|
|
|
|
=== "Python"
|
|
|
|
```python title="complexity_exercises.py"
|
|
def sum_iter(n: int) -> int:
|
|
"""Iterative summation"""
|
|
res = 0
|
|
for i in range(1, n + 1):
|
|
res += i
|
|
return res
|
|
|
|
def sum_recur(n: int) -> int:
|
|
"""Recursive summation"""
|
|
if n == 1:
|
|
return 1
|
|
return n + sum_recur(n - 1)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "C++"
|
|
|
|
```cpp title="complexity_exercises.cpp"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
int sumIter(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
int sumRecur(int n) {
|
|
if (n == 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Java"
|
|
|
|
```java title="complexity_exercises.java"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
int sumIter(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
int sumRecur(int n) {
|
|
if (n == 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "C#"
|
|
|
|
```csharp title="complexity_exercises.cs"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
int SumIter(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
int SumRecur(int n) {
|
|
if (n == 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + SumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Go"
|
|
|
|
```go title="complexity_exercises.go"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
func sumIter(n int) int {
|
|
res := 0
|
|
for i := 1; i <= n; i++ {
|
|
res += i
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
func sumRecur(n int) int {
|
|
if n == 1 {
|
|
return 1
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n-1)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Swift"
|
|
|
|
```swift title="complexity_exercises.swift"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
func sumIter(n: Int) -> Int {
|
|
var res = 0
|
|
for i in 1 ... n {
|
|
res += i
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
func sumRecur(n: Int) -> Int {
|
|
if n == 1 {
|
|
return 1
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n: n - 1)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "JS"
|
|
|
|
```javascript title="complexity_exercises.js"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
function sumIter(n) {
|
|
let res = 0;
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
function sumRecur(n) {
|
|
if (n === 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "TS"
|
|
|
|
```typescript title="complexity_exercises.ts"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
function sumIter(n: number): number {
|
|
let res = 0;
|
|
for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
function sumRecur(n: number): number {
|
|
if (n === 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Dart"
|
|
|
|
```dart title="complexity_exercises.dart"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
int sumIter(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
int sumRecur(int n) {
|
|
if (n == 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Rust"
|
|
|
|
```rust title="complexity_exercises.rs"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
fn sum_iter(n: i32) -> i32 {
|
|
let mut res = 0;
|
|
for i in 1..=n {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
fn sum_recur(n: i32) -> i32 {
|
|
if n == 1 {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
n + sum_recur(n - 1)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "C"
|
|
|
|
```c title="complexity_exercises.c"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
int sumIter(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
int sumRecur(int n) {
|
|
if (n == 1) {
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1);
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Kotlin"
|
|
|
|
```kotlin title="complexity_exercises.kt"
|
|
/* Iterative summation */
|
|
fun sumIter(n: Int): Int {
|
|
var res = 0
|
|
for (i in 1..n) {
|
|
res += i
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Recursive summation */
|
|
fun sumRecur(n: Int): Int {
|
|
if (n == 1) {
|
|
return 1
|
|
}
|
|
return n + sumRecur(n - 1)
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Ruby"
|
|
|
|
```ruby title="complexity_exercises.rb"
|
|
### Iterative summation ###
|
|
def sum_iter(n)
|
|
res = 0
|
|
for i in 1..n
|
|
res += i
|
|
end
|
|
res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
### Recursive summation ###
|
|
def sum_recur(n)
|
|
return 1 if n == 1
|
|
|
|
n + sum_recur(n - 1)
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
<!-- numbered-subquestions -->
|
|
|
|
1. When the iterative function runs with `n = 4`, what is the value of the accumulator `res` after each loop iteration?
|
|
2. When the recursive function runs with `n = 4`, which values does the argument `n` take in order? As the calls return from the deepest level, how is the result obtained?
|
|
3. What are the time and space complexities of the two approaches? Explain your reasoning using the execution processes from Questions 1 and 2.
|
|
|
|
??? success "Answer"
|
|
|
|
1. The loop variable `i` takes the values `1, 2, 3, 4`. After each iteration, `res` becomes
|
|
`1, 3, 6, 10`, respectively, so the iterative function returns 10.
|
|
|
|
2. The argument `n` takes the values `4 → 3 → 2 → 1`.
|
|
The deepest call returns 1. The remaining calls then obtain `2 + 1 = 3`, `3 + 3 = 6`, and `4 + 6 = 10`, in that order.
|
|
At the deepest point, all four function calls are still unfinished.
|
|
|
|
3. Both functions perform a number of loop iterations or calls proportional to $n$, so both have a time complexity of $O(n)$.
|
|
Their space complexities differ. The iterative version uses only a constant number of variables, so its space complexity is $O(1)$.
|
|
In the recursive version, earlier calls must wait for a result before returning, so the call stack holds up to $n$ calls at the same time.
|
|
Its space complexity is $O(n)$.
|
|
|
|
When analyzing space complexity, remember to include the space used by recursive calls as well as the variables written in the code.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Time Complexity of Three Code Fragments
|
|
|
|
Each of the following code fragments takes a positive integer $n$ as input. Order them from lowest to highest time complexity, and give the complexity of each one.
|
|
|
|
=== "Python"
|
|
|
|
```python title="complexity_exercises.py"
|
|
def linear_loop(n: int) -> int:
|
|
"""Linear loop"""
|
|
res = 0
|
|
for i in range(n):
|
|
res += i
|
|
return res
|
|
|
|
def quadratic_loop(n: int) -> int:
|
|
"""Quadratic loop"""
|
|
res = 0
|
|
for i in range(n):
|
|
for j in range(i, n):
|
|
res += j
|
|
return res
|
|
|
|
def logarithmic_loop(n: int) -> int:
|
|
"""Logarithmic loop"""
|
|
while n > 1:
|
|
n //= 2
|
|
return n
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "C++"
|
|
|
|
```cpp title="complexity_exercises.cpp"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
int linearLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
int quadraticLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
|
|
for (int j = i; j < n; ++j) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
int logarithmicLoop(int n) {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n /= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Java"
|
|
|
|
```java title="complexity_exercises.java"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
int linearLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
int quadraticLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
for (int j = i; j < n; j++) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
int logarithmicLoop(int n) {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n /= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "C#"
|
|
|
|
```csharp title="complexity_exercises.cs"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
int LinearLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
int QuadraticLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
for (int j = i; j < n; j++) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
int LogarithmicLoop(int n) {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n /= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Go"
|
|
|
|
```go title="complexity_exercises.go"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
func linearLoop(n int) int {
|
|
res := 0
|
|
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
|
|
res += i
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
func quadraticLoop(n int) int {
|
|
res := 0
|
|
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
|
|
for j := i; j < n; j++ {
|
|
res += j
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
func logarithmicLoop(n int) int {
|
|
for n > 1 {
|
|
n /= 2
|
|
}
|
|
return n
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Swift"
|
|
|
|
```swift title="complexity_exercises.swift"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
func linearLoop(n: Int) -> Int {
|
|
var res = 0
|
|
for i in 0 ..< n {
|
|
res += i
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
func quadraticLoop(n: Int) -> Int {
|
|
var res = 0
|
|
for i in 0 ..< n {
|
|
for j in i ..< n {
|
|
res += j
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
func logarithmicLoop(n: Int) -> Int {
|
|
var n = n
|
|
while n > 1 {
|
|
n /= 2
|
|
}
|
|
return n
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "JS"
|
|
|
|
```javascript title="complexity_exercises.js"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
function linearLoop(n) {
|
|
let res = 0;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
function quadraticLoop(n) {
|
|
let res = 0;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
for (let j = i; j < n; j++) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
function logarithmicLoop(n) {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n = Math.floor(n / 2);
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "TS"
|
|
|
|
```typescript title="complexity_exercises.ts"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
function linearLoop(n: number): number {
|
|
let res = 0;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
function quadraticLoop(n: number): number {
|
|
let res = 0;
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
for (let j = i; j < n; j++) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
function logarithmicLoop(n: number): number {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n = Math.floor(n / 2);
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Dart"
|
|
|
|
```dart title="complexity_exercises.dart"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
int linearLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
int quadraticLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
for (int j = i; j < n; j++) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
int logarithmicLoop(int n) {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n ~/= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Rust"
|
|
|
|
```rust title="complexity_exercises.rs"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
fn linear_loop(n: i32) -> i32 {
|
|
let mut res = 0;
|
|
for i in 0..n {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
fn quadratic_loop(n: i32) -> i32 {
|
|
let mut res = 0;
|
|
for i in 0..n {
|
|
for j in i..n {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
fn logarithmic_loop(mut n: i32) -> i32 {
|
|
while n > 1 {
|
|
n /= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
n
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "C"
|
|
|
|
```c title="complexity_exercises.c"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
int linearLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
res += i;
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
int quadraticLoop(int n) {
|
|
int res = 0;
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
for (int j = i; j < n; j++) {
|
|
res += j;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
int logarithmicLoop(int n) {
|
|
while (n > 1) {
|
|
n /= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
return n;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Kotlin"
|
|
|
|
```kotlin title="complexity_exercises.kt"
|
|
/* Linear loop */
|
|
fun linearLoop(n: Int): Int {
|
|
var res = 0
|
|
for (i in 0 until n) {
|
|
res += i
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quadratic loop */
|
|
fun quadraticLoop(n: Int): Int {
|
|
var res = 0
|
|
for (i in 0 until n) {
|
|
for (j in i until n) {
|
|
res += j
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return res
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Logarithmic loop */
|
|
fun logarithmicLoop(n: Int): Int {
|
|
var value = n
|
|
while (value > 1) {
|
|
value /= 2
|
|
}
|
|
return value
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
=== "Ruby"
|
|
|
|
```ruby title="complexity_exercises.rb"
|
|
### Linear loop ###
|
|
def linear_loop(n)
|
|
res = 0
|
|
for i in 0...n
|
|
res += i
|
|
end
|
|
res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
### Quadratic loop ###
|
|
def quadratic_loop(n)
|
|
res = 0
|
|
for i in 0...n
|
|
for j in i...n
|
|
res += j
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
res
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
### Logarithmic loop ###
|
|
def logarithmic_loop(n)
|
|
n /= 2 while n > 1
|
|
n
|
|
end
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
??? success "Answer"
|
|
|
|
From lowest to highest, the order is Fragment 3 with $O(\log n)$, Fragment 1 with $O(n)$, and Fragment 2 with $O(n^2)$.
|
|
Fragment 3 halves $n$ in each iteration, so it runs about $\log_2 n$ times.
|
|
The loop in Fragment 1 runs exactly $n$ times. The inner loop in Fragment 2 runs
|
|
$n,n-1,\dots,1$ times, for a total of $n(n+1)/2$, so its time complexity is quadratic.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Which Reversal Uses Less Space?
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to reverse all the elements in the array `nums`:
|
|
|
|
<!-- numbered-subquestions -->
|
|
|
|
1. Create a new array `res` of the same length, copy the elements into it in reverse order, and return it.
|
|
2. Move two indices `i` and `j` inward from the beginning and end, swapping `nums[i]` and `nums[j]` at each step.
|
|
|
|
What is the space complexity of each approach? Which one is an "in-place" operation?
|
|
|
|
??? success "Answer"
|
|
|
|
1. This approach needs an auxiliary array with the same length as the input, so its space complexity is $O(n)$.
|
|
|
|
2. This approach uses only two index variables,
|
|
so its space complexity is $O(1)$. It is an in-place operation.
|
|
|
|
Note that an in-place reversal changes the input array,
|
|
so it should be preferred only when modifying the input is allowed. If the original array must be kept, the copying cost of the first approach is unavoidable.
|
|
|
|
## 2.6.2 Programming Exercises
|
|
|
|
### 1. Fibonacci Number
|
|
|
|
The Fibonacci sequence is defined by $F(0)=0$, $F(1)=1$, and, for $n\ge2$,
|
|
$F(n)=F(n-1)+F(n-2)$.
|
|
|
|
Given a non-negative integer `n`, use a loop to calculate and return $F(n)$. Do not use recursion.
|
|
|
|
??? tip "Hints"
|
|
|
|
1. Handle the cases where n is 0 or 1 separately
|
|
2. Only the previous two terms are needed to calculate the next term; there is no need to store the entire sequence
|
|
3. When updating the two variables, take care not to overwrite an old value before it is used
|
|
|
|
[LeetCode](https://leetcode.com/problems/fibonacci-number/){ .rounded-button .exercise-button target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" }
|